Thursday, December 09, 2004

LIVE!! LIVE!! LIVE!!

For all you people who are into music - and I mean real music, not Maiden, Blcksabbath, or Megadeath - here's an interesting question to to waste time thinking about. Why the heck can't you're favorite artiste perform well on stage?? Oh come on, you know that all his live performances SUCKED!
Have you ever noticed the (complete abscence of) quality your singer has when it comes to a live performance? Take, for example, Sting. He's one of my musical idols. Amazing music since god-alone-knows-when. I recently came across one of his more recent albums, called "All This Time" where he sang all his famous hits like 'Roxanne', 'Fields Of Gold', 'A Thousand Years', and so on live. And he sucked. He (quite literally) wasn't singing it. He was speaking it, with a little pitch adjustment here and there.
Now everyone may think it sounds damn cool to give their concerts a 'personal' touch, and make the audience feel (almost) interacted with, but in reality, all they do is spoil one heck of a good song for no real reason. And to top this off, people pretend to have loved it, just so they can be Cool, and be part of the In Crowd.
As far as I know, the only artist that is an exeption to this is Dire Straits. Their album "Alchemy", is live in london, and it is electric!!! If you've heard 'Sultans Of Swing' and liked it, you will go bananas after hearing the Live version - 10 minutes of a pure, electric, sensational Mark Knopfler ceation at its absolute best. WOW. Him and Joe Satiriani are the only guitarist - performers that do a really good job of it - intentionally.
Of course, there's other people who do it well in concert. But that's not because they want to do it that way - it's because they know no other way to do it, and so it sounds a lot like the recorded thing, which, frankly, I don't think the mob - oops! - crowd minds.
A classic example is (forgive me Aasimah) Bryan Adams. Sure, he's got some good music, looks, and voice, but damn, he's got absolutely no creativity. Not that its a bd thing, I thought that he performed really well on stage, coming and getting some girls to sing wit him and all. And that would only be possible if he stuck to his original tune, which he did.
And, to give due credit to Arjun's Gods, Maiden didn't perform that bad either, and I quite liked a live recording (that shouldn't make sense, right...? ;-) ) of Metallica that I heard.
If you look inside and question yourself, I'm confident that you will find you feel the same. Some one should sue these rich p*mps for emotional trauma or something. I mean, how can anyone put up with bad music?? Even the artist him/her/themselves?

2 comments:

Aveek said...

So why didn't you just put up a post...? The comment was larger than the post itself! Hehe... Nice to hear from you... Yes, Sting does have some very good performances, but the entire album was a let-down, except for Fields Of Gold. WOW.

Anonymous said...

metallica, and maiden rule, your just pathetic
and they can ACTUALLY perform on stage, they ACTUALLY write their own lyrics, and they ACTUALLY sing them. (hint hint ashley simpson)

Joe SATRIANI (watch spelling) is a god. that i will not contest. Kirk Hammett (metallica lead) was his pupil...

and after coming to muwci and seeing the crap guitaring, i do believe hemanth is the best guitarist ive seen (even though he has no taste and goes out with my sister. ouch. come to think of it, even my sister has no taste. double ouch)

and if you want REAL LIVE performances, stop listening to pop, grow up and listen to REAL classical music.
go watch the Berlin Philharmonic if you want to see real music performed by real people and not synced from the background.

'nuff said

arjun